<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>jesusdiaz</title><link>http://jesusdiaz.kinja.com</link><description></description><language>en</language><item><title><![CDATA[Who the fuck cares about your Twatterer. ]]></title><link>http://gawker.com/who-the-fuck-cares-about-your-twatterer-didnt-you-see-509373332</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Who the fuck cares about your Twatterer. Didn't you see what he says on the video?</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:44:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509373332</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Exactly. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/exactly-this-denial-of-chinas-industrial-prowess-by-se-509320871</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Exactly. This denial of China's industrial prowess by seemingly insecure Americans really puzzles me. They have access to the machinery, the materials, the plans and the engineers.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:35:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509320871</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Good one.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/good-one-509312583</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Good one.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:03:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509312583</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/yes-and-then-they-can-improve-over-other-peoples-work-509295707</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Yes. And then they can improve over other people's work. It's not that they don't have smart engineers and resources. They have them by the ton.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:56:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509295707</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[I doubt it's that easy, but I wouldn't be surprised if they had infiltrated computer systems. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/i-doubt-its-that-easy-but-i-wouldnt-be-surprised-if-th-509295434</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">I doubt it's that easy, but I wouldn't be surprised if they had infiltrated computer systems. In any case, there's definitely spying going on. But make no mistake: it's only a matter of time before they start improving on their own—precisely because they have the engineers and resources. They just saved themselves decades of work by looking at what the US has.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:55:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509295434</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[I doubt your bear brother is as furry as me.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/i-doubt-your-bear-brother-is-as-furry-as-me-509291316</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">I doubt your bear brother is as furry as me.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:37:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509291316</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not everything that China does is inferior quality. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/not-everything-that-china-does-is-inferior-quality-the-509291060</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Not everything that China does is inferior quality. They do plenty of very high quality stuff.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:36:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509291060</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Jersey has their own fleet of drones with italian accents, gold jewelry and fake tans.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/new-jersey-has-their-own-fleet-of-drones-with-italian-a-509290908</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">New Jersey has their own fleet of drones with italian accents, gold jewelry and fake tans.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:36:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509290908</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[China Has Their Own Stealth Drone]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/china-has-their-own-stealth-drone-509289529</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18ogxnhh9njw4jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">This is China's stealth combat drone, an airplane that seems very similar to the American Northrop Grumman X-47B. The unmanned combat air vehicle was photographed while performing taxiing tests. Given the development speed of China's other military airplanes, it wouldn't be surprising to see this in flight in the next few weeks.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-chinese-x-47-is-real.html" target="_blank">China Defense Blog</a>, it was initially labeled to be a project by &quot;college students&quot; for the 601 Aircraft Design Institute/Shenyang Aircraft Corporation. Clearly, it's much more than that.</p>
<p>It seems obvious that China's military complex is advancing at a higher pace than many in the West would like to believe. It is not comparable to the United States yet, but the technology matching may be a matter of years and not decades. And it has already happened in the cyber war front. [<a href="http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-chinese-x-47-is-real.html" target="_blank">China Defense Blog</a>]</p>]]></description><category domain="">airplanes</category><category domain="">military</category><category domain="">x-47b</category><category domain="">ucav</category><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509289529</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mi impresión es que en Menéame hay siempre varios grupos que hacen que ciertas conversaciones tengan]]></title><link>http://es.gizmodo.com/mi-impresion-es-que-en-meneame-hay-siempre-varios-grupo-509270379</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Mi impresión es que en Menéame hay siempre varios grupos que hacen que ciertas conversaciones tengan un sesgo u otro, especialmente en temas políticos. Hay críticas al respecto que mencionan la falta real de democracia en un sistema profundamente jerarquizado—algo que también sufre Reddit. ¿Crees que esas tendencias son ciertas? ¿Se te ocurre alguna manera de hacer un sistema realmente democrático donde participe todo el mundo y que no esté secuestrado por gente con demasiado tiempo libre para subir su karma en este tipo de sitios web?</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:01:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509270379</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who the fuck is the insufferable twunt taking photos with his fucking DSLR constantly? ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/who-the-fuck-is-the-insufferable-twunt-taking-photos-wi-509199148</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Who the fuck is the insufferable twunt taking photos with his fucking DSLR constantly? Christ, people don't have a fucking clue about how to take photos in an event like this.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509199148</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[One of the many applications, hopefully.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/one-of-the-many-applications-hopefully-509096204</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">One of the many applications, hopefully.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:42:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509096204</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes and yes.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/yes-and-yes-509096146</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Yes and yes.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:41:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509096146</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes and yes.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/yes-and-yes-509095764</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Yes and yes.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:40:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509095764</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The New Kinect Is So Sensitive It Can Read Your Heartbeat]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/the-new-kinect-is-so-sensitive-it-can-read-your-heartbe-509073431</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18odmq2c5duyojpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p><p class="first-text">Microsoft claims that the new Kinect is so sensitive that it can see the slightest movement of your wrists and fingers, the tension of your muscles and, amazingly enough, even your <em>heartbeat</em>.</p>
<p>So next time you exercise in front of the TV, it will be able to tell how much you are really working out. But I bet there will be a lot more to this feature, like a first-person shooter reading your heart beat and muscle tension to spook you at the right moment. And kill you for real.</p>]]></description><category domain="">xbox one</category><category domain="">gaming</category><category domain="">kinect</category><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509073431</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[mañana miércoles 22, a las 16:00 horas (España) / 9:00 horas (México) / 10:00 horas (EST - Nueva Yor]]></title><link>http://es.gizmodo.com/manana-miercoles-22-a-las-16-00-horas-espana-9-00-509040429</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text"><strong>mañana miércoles 22</strong>, a las <strong>16:00 horas (España) / 9:00 horas (México) / 10:00 horas (EST - Nueva York)</strong>.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:32:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509040429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The plane will stop working because there will not be enough oxygen for the engines to work. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/the-plane-will-stop-working-because-there-will-not-be-e-508991032</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">The plane will stop working because there will not be enough oxygen for the engines to work. It will not get anywhere near space.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:07:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508991032</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Regardless of the veracity of her story, I think Seamless did all the right things here. ]]></title><link>http://gawker.com/regardless-of-the-veracity-of-her-story-i-think-seamle-508916028</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Regardless of the veracity of her story, I think Seamless did all the right things here. Maybe because I hate Notdogs™</p>
<p>™ by the dearly missed Emma Carmichael (who is not dead)</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508916028</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[or he would have died because of lack of oxygen]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/or-he-would-have-died-because-of-lack-of-oxygen-508914136</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">or he would have died because of lack of oxygen</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:56:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508914136</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Porno indeed.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/porno-indeed-508913839</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Porno indeed.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:55:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508913839</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Most Awesome F-35 Video I've Ever Seen]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/the-most-awesome-f-35-video-ive-ever-seen-508892506</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aWji8AcOYGA?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-aWji8AcOYGA"></iframe></span></p><p class="first-text"> Lockheed Martin just completed the latest high angle of attack test series. It was a complete success, as this video shots. The video footage is spectacular, especially that unreal first shot:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif., May 16, 2013 – The latest in a series of Lockheed Martin [LMT] F-35A high angle of attack (AOA) testing was recently completed.  The testing accomplished high AOA beyond both the positive and negative maximum command limits, including intentionally putting the aircraft out of control in several configurations. This included initially flying in the stealth clean wing configuration. It was followed by testing with external air-to-air pylons and missiles and then with open weapon bay doors.  The F-35A began edge-of-the-envelope high AOA testing in the Fall 2012.  For all testing, recovery from out of control flight has been 100 percent successful without the use of the spin recovery chute, which is carried to maximize safety. </p>
</blockquote>]]></description><category domain="">airplanes</category><category domain="">f-35</category><category domain="">aoa</category><category domain="">video</category><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:18:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508892506</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Now I will have to rewatch the entire series again, for the fourth time.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/now-i-will-have-to-rewatch-the-entire-series-again-for-508318715</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Now I will have to rewatch the entire series again, for the fourth time.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:10:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508318715</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thank you!]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/thank-you-508306523</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Thank you!</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:19:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508306523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thank you!]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/thank-you-508306354</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Thank you!</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:18:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508306354</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nothing but the rain.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/nothing-but-the-rain-508305929</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Nothing but the rain.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:16:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508305929</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item></channel></rss>