<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>jesusdiaz</title><link>http://jesusdiaz.kinja.com</link><description></description><language>en</language><item><title><![CDATA[The New Kinect Is So Sensitive It Can Read Your Heartbeat]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/the-new-kinect-is-so-sensitive-it-can-read-your-heartbe-509073431</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18odmq2c5duyojpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p><p class="first-text">Microsoft claims that the new Kinect is so sensitive that it can see the slightest movement of your wrists and fingers, the tension of your muscles and, amazingly enough, even your <em>heartbeat</em>.</p>
<p>So next time you exercise in front of the TV, it will be able to tell how much you are really working out. But I bet there will be a lot more to this feature, like a first-person shooter reading your heart beat and muscle tension to spook you at the right moment. And kill you fore real.</p>]]></description><category domain="">xbox one</category><category domain="">gaming</category><category domain="">kinect</category><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509073431</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[mañana miércoles 22, a las 16:00 horas (España) / 9:00 horas (México) / 10:00 horas (EST - Nueva Yor]]></title><link>http://es.gizmodo.com/manana-miercoles-22-a-las-16-00-horas-espana-9-00-509040429</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text"><strong>mañana miércoles 22</strong>, a las <strong>16:00 horas (España) / 9:00 horas (México) / 10:00 horas (EST - Nueva York)</strong>.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:32:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">509040429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The plane will stop working because there will not be enough oxygen for the engines to work. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/the-plane-will-stop-working-because-there-will-not-be-e-508991032</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">The plane will stop working because there will not be enough oxygen for the engines to work. It will not get anywhere near space.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:07:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508991032</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Regardless of the veracity of her story, I think Seamless did all the right things here. ]]></title><link>http://gawker.com/regardless-of-the-veracity-of-her-story-i-think-seamle-508916028</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Regardless of the veracity of her story, I think Seamless did all the right things here. Maybe because I hate Notdogs™</p>
<p>™ by the dearly missed Emma Carmichael (who is not dead)</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508916028</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[or he would have died because of lack of oxygen]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/or-he-would-have-died-because-of-lack-of-oxygen-508914136</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">or he would have died because of lack of oxygen</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:56:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508914136</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Porno indeed.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/porno-indeed-508913839</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Porno indeed.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:55:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508913839</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Most Awesome F-35 Video I've Ever Seen]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/the-most-awesome-f-35-video-ive-ever-seen-508892506</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aWji8AcOYGA?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-aWji8AcOYGA"></iframe></span></p><p class="first-text"> Lockheed Martin just completed the latest high angle of attack test series. It was a complete success, as this video shots. The video footage is spectacular, especially that unreal first shot:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif., May 16, 2013 – The latest in a series of Lockheed Martin [LMT] F-35A high angle of attack (AOA) testing was recently completed.  The testing accomplished high AOA beyond both the positive and negative maximum command limits, including intentionally putting the aircraft out of control in several configurations. This included initially flying in the stealth clean wing configuration. It was followed by testing with external air-to-air pylons and missiles and then with open weapon bay doors.  The F-35A began edge-of-the-envelope high AOA testing in the Fall 2012.  For all testing, recovery from out of control flight has been 100 percent successful without the use of the spin recovery chute, which is carried to maximize safety. </p>
</blockquote>]]></description><category domain="">airplanes</category><category domain="">f-35</category><category domain="">aoa</category><category domain="">video</category><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:18:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508892506</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Now I will have to rewatch the entire series again, for the fourth time.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/now-i-will-have-to-rewatch-the-entire-series-again-for-508318715</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Now I will have to rewatch the entire series again, for the fourth time.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:10:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508318715</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thank you!]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/thank-you-508306523</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Thank you!</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:19:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508306523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thank you!]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/thank-you-508306354</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Thank you!</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:18:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508306354</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nothing but the rain.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/nothing-but-the-rain-508305929</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Nothing but the rain.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:16:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508305929</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[What are the laws of physics that limit any of these ships exactly?]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/what-are-the-laws-of-physics-that-limit-any-of-these-sh-508291230</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">What are the laws of physics that limit any of these ships exactly?</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:19:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508291230</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hands off my English terrorism acts.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/hands-off-my-english-terrorism-acts-508291017</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Hands off my English terrorism acts.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:18:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508291017</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA["My ship drawing is larger than yours"]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/my-ship-drawing-is-larger-than-yours-508290812</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">&quot;My ship drawing is larger than yours&quot;</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:17:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">508290812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Big Is the New Enterprise Compared to the Old One?]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/5253324/how-big-is-the-new-enterprise-compared-to-the-old-one</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18nzbii41f0m3jpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p>
<p class="first-text">725.35 meters. A whoppumental 2,379.75 feet. That's how big the new super-sized Enterprise is. Here you can see it compared against the Galactica, the good old Enterprise, the Blockade Runner, and the ISS. <strong><br/></strong></p>
<p>When JJ Abrams said that he wanted to put some Star Wars into Star Trek, apparently it also applied to the scale of spaceships. And while the new Enterprise doesn't even reach half of the 1,600 meters—that's a mile long—of an Imperial Star Destroyer, it's still amazingly big compared to the 288 meters of the old Enterprise. Maybe now you would be able to take down an Star Destroyer with a couple of these.</p>
<p>How much would it cost to build this thing today? <a href="http://gizmodo.com/how-much-would-it-cost-to-build-the-starship-enterprise-506174071">This much</a><inset id="506174071"></inset>.</p>]]></description><category domain="">spaceships</category><category domain="">enterprise</category><category domain="">new enterprise</category><category domain="">sizemodo</category><category domain="">size</category><category domain="">comparison</category><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5253324</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gracias!]]></title><link>http://front.kinja.com/gracias-506154856</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Gracias!</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 02:21:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">506154856</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yes. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/yes-but-sadly-i-really-think-people-dont-give-a-damn-506153921</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Yes. But, sadly, I really think people don't give a damn.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 02:19:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">506153921</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Good one! ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/good-one-i-edited-the-headline-to-be-more-accurate-i-505986609</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Good one! I edited the headline to be more accurate. I guess that, in my mind, this looks like the future.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:43:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505986609</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[But fair enough: edited the headline and text.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/but-fair-enough-edited-the-headline-and-text-505985829</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">But fair enough: edited the headline and text.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:42:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505985829</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Landed on land, not a carrier.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/landed-on-land-not-a-carrier-505981060</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Landed on land, not a carrier.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:36:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505981060</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[I can't wait for direct brain links.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/i-cant-wait-for-direct-brain-links-505980655</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">I can't wait for direct brain links.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:35:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505980655</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's pretty kick ass.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/its-pretty-kick-ass-505980250</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">It's pretty kick ass.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:35:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505980250</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[First awesome plane launch.]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/first-awesome-plane-launch-505979823</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">First awesome plane launch.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:34:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505979823</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Watch the First Ever Carrier Drone Jet Launch]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/first-video-of-the-first-drone-ever-launched-from-a-car-505958985</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><span class="flex-video widescreen"><iframe mozallowfullscreen="mozallowfullscreen" webkitAllowFullScreen="webkitAllowFullScreen" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" class="youtube" height="360" width="640" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_FMvNrkwmi0?wmode=transparent&amp;rel=0&amp;autohide=1&amp;showinfo=0" id="youtube-_FMvNrkwmi0"></iframe></span></p><p class="first-text"> You are about to witness a historical event: the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/the-navys-x-47b-drone-proves-can-take-off-from-carrier-505732511">first drone jet ever launched from an aircraft carrier</a><inset id="505732511"></inset>. In a few decades, when autonomous drone planes battle each other in the skies, fire missiles at drone troops and battleships, humanity will look back at this day as the true beginning of total drone warfare.</p>
<p>Of course, the Northrop Grumman X-47B launched today from the USS George H.W. Bush at 11:18EST is <em>not</em> the first drone ever. But it marks the most important milestone. This launch heralds complete worldwide mobility to the United States' unmanned aerial vehicle fleet.</p>
<p>Sooner than we think, the Pentagon will be able to easily and conveniently deploy autonomous fighters, and bombers anywhere in the globe thanks to their aircraft carriers. And then, one day, Skynet will gain self-awareness. Fun times ahead!</p>]]></description><category domain="">military</category><category domain="">airplanes</category><category domain="">uav</category><category domain="">ucas</category><category domain="">drone</category><category domain="">x-47b</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">505958985</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yeah. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/yeah-i-just-love-good-disco-their-bass-lines-are-grea-504782853</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Yeah. I just love good disco. Their bass lines are great.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 20:19:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">504782853</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator></item></channel></rss>